The Chances of a Labour Victory

The chances of a Labour victory at the next election with Ed Milliband as Leader are thin. Although the Tory's are doing their best to confirm to the nation, what most sane people already know, that they are a bunch of arrogant, ideologically driven, incompetent snobs with only their own interests at heart,that was proven by the Chief Whips outburst, people seem to mystfyingly prefer 'old doughnut face' over Miliband.
However, the main stumbling block seems to be Ed Millibands personal standing with the nation. The main objection many people seem to hold against him becoming Prime Minister is that he looks like a nerd. Which when you consider that type of rationale, you realise it is an opinion so high up on the stupid scale that anybody who considers that a large minority of the public are vacuous morons can feel fully justified in holding that opinion. What they are saying, is that they wouldn't vote for Ed Miliband because he looks, well, intelligent, and they would  only consider voting Labour if the Leader was Cheryl Cole or someone off TOWIE.
Of  course Labours main problem is not the worrying ascetics of Ed Millibands facial features but the lack of a cause. The Torys objectives are clear. They want to roll back to state, dismantle the NHS, privatise education and create a compliant labour pool  based on Victorian values. A time when power and privilege was held and jealously controlled by a select few wealthy families and individuals, who ensured it remained closely guarded and never left their greasy grasp. This entire philosophy is based on an attitude of 'why must I pay for the education and healthcare of the plebs and their children when surely if they remain poor, hungry and uneducated then they will die sooner.' It may be considered extreme to couch it in those terms but it is obvious, ably demonstrated by Mitchell's outburst towards the Police, that through every Tory runs a thick seam of hatred for the people they likely refer to as 'plebs, 'lower orders' or, I expect this one is only used around the cabinet table, ' idle working class chav scum'.
Labours objectives are thin and watery and seem to be nothing more than trying to placate the 'Daily Heil' brigade with their pathetic leap upon the 'lets demonise people claiming benefits' bandwagon as they pander to the  bigoted middle classes. Labour use to be the party that protected the poor and vulnerable, now they are just theTory-lite party with nothing new to say.Whereas theTorys want to place a bomb under society, retire to a safe distance, probably their estates in the country, and blow it to smithereens, all Labour can do is promise, if they are re-elected,  to tinker around a bit, slip in a bit of fascist hyperbole every now and then, and hope things will get better.
The Labour Party may not be able to regain its relevancy to the working class until the Tory's have accomplished their mission of turning Britain into a society of hate filled, self interest driven individuals who consider no action being beyond the pale if it is in the interests of looking after number one.
Two of the many examples of Tory rhetoric are relevant. When Liam Fox, the ex-defence secretary, renown for travelling the world on official business in the company of his man friend,venomously accused Polly Toynbee on Any Questions of being 'a bleeding heart liberal'. The impression being that Fox considered anybody who was concerned for the plight of others was committing a crime against humanity and the classic comment of Thatcher 'There is no such thing as society, only families and individuals'.

 Thatchers quote sums up this current gang of greasy Tory boys philosophies perfectly.


Jimmy Savile.

Since the unpleasant revelations and accusations about Jimmy Savile have come into the public domain, several people have crawled out of the woodwork, saying how they saw this and noticed that and were fully aware of his proclivities. One individual has recounted a time when he walked into Saviles bedroom to find him in bed with a 14yr old girl. A girl he claims he saw Savile with in a restaurant the night before. It's a shame these people never bothered to speak up at the time, it may have saved many ruined lives. Their defence seems to be that he was too powerful. Which is quite frankly, ridicoulous. He was an eccentric, medallion wearing disc jockey with a strange dress sense not the Boss of the Gambino family. I think these people were more concerned about the effects any disclosures would have on their own interests rather than saving young girls from being abused. They were looking after number one.Just like the Tory's



" If the claim is true and we are all living in one of many parallel lives.Then how come I got the crappy one."