Monday, 9 December 2013

£73000 for an MP:What a Joke.


The recommendation that Members of Parliament should receive an increase in salary to £73000 per annum is a disgrace. Being a back bench MP is an absolute skive. Their responsibilities, other than dealing with the odd constituent’s problem and acting like boorish thugs during Prime Minister Questions, is minimal.
What do they do all week? If dealing with constituent’s queries and problems is such a heavy workload then how come they only hold one constituency surgery a week, if that? They get close to 20 weeks holiday a year and let’s be honest, if you live in a constituency where you did not vote for the sitting MP then you have no representation at all. If you disagree with the current governments policies, going to an MP to complain, that is part of that government, is going to be pointless. Their response will be ‘I’m not really bothered with your concerns. You didn't vote for me so why should I care about your problems and concerns’. The only responsibility of an MP is to look after those people who voted for them. Anybody else can go to hell. An MP’s main concern is looking after number one. They are selfish, self centred individuals whose only concern is their standing in society and how they can line their own pockets.
They complain that their salaries have fallen, in comparison to professions such as Head Teachers, Colonels and Doctors, but these people have real! responsibility. They are dealing with life and death situations and the education of young people that can improve life opportunities. An MP’s workload involves dealing with somebody who isn't getting their bins emptied on time or turning up for a photo opportunity because another charity shop is opening in the High Street. Also, being a Member of Parliament is not a profession. To be an MP you do not have to pass any exams or achieve any qualifications. It is one of the least qualified jobs in the land and where training is minimal. Most of these people are unqualified and untrained for the role they fill.
They air that old chestnut ‘you won’t get the right calibre of people’ but how much is a nurse paid? How much is a fireman paid? How much does a soldier, who is serving in Afghanistan, get? What about the WPC who was shot last week? How much does she get paid a year. I doubt any of them receive more than £25000- £35000 per annum. Are we saying they are of poor calibre because they choose to work a profession that pays, in comparison to an MP, peanuts? This type of attitude demonstrates how detached politicians are from real life and how full they are of their own self importance.
Members of Parliament should receive no more than £40000 per annum, and that’s probably too high for the job they do, and it should be performance related. If an MP fails to turn up for a vote then they should not be paid. All MP’s should be subjected to a yearly constituency satisfaction survey. If they fail to achieve 51% then their pay should be reduced by 20% for the next year.
 Most of them are just time servers, waiting to cash in their very generous pension before taking up a non-executive position on the board of a company, whose interests they have been serving while they were an MP.

Autumn Statement Debacle.

Putting aside the ridiculous forecasts of Chancellor Exchequer Osborne (he hasn't hit one forecast in three years in office), and that within a day, The Institute for Fiscal Studies had picked his Autumn Statement apart and destroyed it, along with any economic credibility Osborne, or his plan, has. The main disgrace was the yobbish behaviour from the coalition MP’s when Ed Balls gave his response for the opposition.
The opposition represent millions of people in this country and those people have a right to hear their representative make a statement on their behalf. Having to listen to a cacophony of never-ending braying from a bunch of loutish yobs is not democracy in action and proves that MP’s are not worth the salary they receive or that they give a toss about the democratic process. 
 
Nelson Mandela.

There has been one aspect around the death of Nelson Mandela that has been truly vomit inducing, of which below is an illustrative example.

Tory’s circa 2013:

‘The death of Nelson Mandela is very sad. A light has gone out in the world. He was a fine advocate of freedom and democracy and a great world statesman’. ( sniff)

Tory’s circa 1988:

‘ That damn Mandela chappie is nothing more than a terrorist who should be bloody well executed. Maggie( Thatcher) got it right. Those damn uppity blacks should know their place. Bloody ANC should all be shot. What do you say Cammers’.

‘Oh dead right ossers. What say we go out and buy one of those ‘Hang Mandela’ tee shirts?’ (snort)

‘Super idea Cammers, what larks’. (snort)

The lengths people will go for the purposes of political expediency. The days of conviction politics are long gone, replaced with a bunch of political chancer’s ,who are prepared to say or do anything, no matter how hypocritical, if they think it will win them votes.


No comments:

Post a Comment