When the
Tory Minister for Welfare let it slip that he thought some people who were
disabled were not ‘worth’ the minimum wage ( £6.50 per hour) and that paying
£2.00 an hour would be more appropriate, the fact that his name was Lord Freud
would have been funny if it wasn't for the toxic message he was
sending.
Several
reactionary’s jumped to his defence, claiming that he had a point and some
people with disabilities were ‘worth’ less and that his attitude certainly did
not have a whiff and taint that
reminded you of an attitude once held towards the disabled, as well as Jews, gypsies
and homosexuals, by a certain European country not more than seventy years ago.
There are
claims that the Leader of the Opposition, Ed Miliband, when he raised it at
PMQ’s (Prime Ministers Question Time),
was trying to make political capital, when all he was asking was whether the
government held a position where they felt disabled people were worth less than
able bodied people. Prime Minister Cameron, thrown by the question, assumed his
normal response, when caught out, of braying angrily back across the commons
like a stereotypical toff scolding one of the estate peasants, and yet again attempted to use
his own disabled son as a shield.
Unfortunately, this attitude of Freud’s is not
an unusual one in 21st century Britain. There appears to be a
growing attitude within society, that disabled people are nothing but spongers
and that the blind person or the woman suffering from cerebral palsy are just
feigning their disability so they can fraudulently receive disability benefit.
There is a sense that people are becoming prejudiced towards anybody who doesn't fit
their closed view of normality and are resentful and envious of anybody they
consider different. It is an attitude that was faced by Asian migrants coming
to this country, Afro-Caribbean migrants, Jewish migrants, Irish migrants, even
the Huguenots. In fact anybody viewed as different by the indigenous
population. Yet again the ugly head of
the small-minded Brit, always worrying about what other people have got, raises
it head above the parapet. No wonder that ‘little Englander’ party UKip (United
Kingdom Independence Party) is supposedly getting a handhold in British
politics. This is the type of society they would relish, where the strong turn
on the weak.
I thought Britain was suppose to be a nation of fairness and
progressiveness and that we protected the weak and vulnerable.But it turns out
we are a nasty nation of men and women who turn on the defenceless and helpless
because we think the pittance they receive, in order to live, is slightly more
than we would like and if we paid disabled people less then we could have more.
Quite frankly it disgusts me. I am British, I'm proud to be British and proud that
I live by values where I believe the weakest in society should be protected because that is right, fair,
civilised and humane.
An example
of this apparently growing, nasty, mean spirited and revolting attitude
occurred in a Tesco supermarket in Swiss Cottage, London, last week. Where a
blind person was shouted and screamed at by three members of staff because she
came into the store with her guide dog, which was clearly marked by the dogs’
high visibility jacket (feel free to e-mail the company or store, to ask them
why their training is crap and that their staff are idiots. I know I will).
These vile and foul individuals refused to listen to her, told her to leave,
and to never ever come back to the store. The only silver lining to this
disgraceful occurrence was that other customers stood up on behalf of the
customer and her dog. But what type of horrid and venal human scum do you have
to be to shout at a blind woman and her dog and try to evict them from a store? Sadly the lady in question said this was not an isolated incident and that she
has experienced several other instances of this particularly unpleasant, cruel
and nauseatingly prejudiced attitude since she moved to London. I’m all for
building a wall around the M25, to encircle London and keep the misanthropic
scum from poisoning the rest of Britain. Perhaps we could put a roof on it as
well to contain their stink.
There is anecdotal evidence that taxi and mini-cab drivers refuse to take blind people if they are accompanied by a guide dog as well as thousands of businesses across the land flouting the laws that apply to guide dogs. Of course there is a simple solution.You hit the transgressors with massive fines or imprisonment.
All people
are equal, irrespective of skill levels or intellect. Paying someone £2.00 an
hour does not give anyone dignity, it strips them of dignity. We need an
inclusive and empowered society where all people are treated with respect. That
way people will strive to succeed, which, in turn, will enrich lives,
businesses and society. You have to build people up not rip them down.
Of course
Lord Freud has previous when it comes to ignorant and disparaging remarks about
people in need of welfare when he accused users of food banks as people making
a ‘lifestyle choice’ that gave them access to free food. The toxic idiot is
obviously unaware about the rules around food banks where a referral from a
welfare agency is required and you can only use a food bank twice within a
twelve month period. But let’s not be surprised when a Tory ignores the facts in favour of spewing out a piece of noxious, bigoted and ignorant propaganda.
As a final
example of this government’s illiterate policy making, I bring you the case of Remploy.
This organisation, set up by a previous government, operated factories and
workshops that made furniture and other goods. It employed 10,000 employees, who
were all disabled.
This
government, in the form of Iain Duncan Smith, Works and Pensions Minister, Gods
self appointed emissary on earth ,and Lord Freud’s boss, closed Remploy down
and made 10,000 disabled employees unemployed, thus stripping them of any
dignity they may have had.
NOW HOW
STUPID WAS THAT!!
The Great Intern Scam.
Internships
are nothing more than slave labour used by businesses to keep costs down and a
way of businesses and corporations to abdicate responsibility for the training
of staff. Unpaid internships cause massive social division because they deny
children of less well off families access to work because of the impossibility of
meeting living costs, whereas the children of well off families are able to
take advantage of unpaid work because their wealthy parents cover their living
costs.
This is
particularly the case in London where poorer, but probably more talented
children, are unable to get a foothold on the employment ladder, leaving the
employment field open for the less intelligent
and dimmer offspring of the better off. This in turn increases social division
and restricts social mobility.
It is a
disgrace that many politicians take advantage of this free labour and many
corporations have a 3 month revolving door of internships ,when at the end of
the three months, a batch of new interns turn up to replace the existing
interns, who are cast out.
Businesses
complain that Universities do not produce work-ready graduates, but that is
just another way of saying that businesses can’t be bothered to invest in
training new staff and they expect others to bear the responsibility and costs.
Unpaid
internships should be made illegal, universities should include internships
within their courses, and businesses should be made accountable for training
their new staff and paying them at least the minimum wage.
This claim
of penury by massive corporations is laughable. You can guarantee that the
executives of these so-called cash strapped corporations will all be in receipt
of massive salary packages while claiming they cannot afford to pay interns the
minimum wage.
Unpaid
internships are a con and an example of the ‘something for nothing ‘culture
hypocritically practiced by big business on a daily basis. Internships restrict
social mobility and contribute to the current social division this Tory
government is so keen to create and profit from.
Ban them!
Ban them now! They are a con!
Prison Tariffs.
The release
from prison of Ched Evans, the footballer who has served two and a half years
of a five year sentence for rape, has highlighted a problem within the British
justice system.
It is not
that he can return to a lucrative career playing football while his victim must
spend the rest of her life living with the consequences of his crime. The
situation would be the same if it was a plumber or a lawyer. They've served
their time and no matter how distasteful it may seem, they have to be allowed
to rehabilitate themselves and earn a living.
The problem
is with the length of tariffs given to people who have committed violent crimes, and rape is a very violent crime. Five years for committing rape is a pathetic length
of time to be given.
The tariff
for any violent crime should be at least ten years, with at least 75% of the
tariff served in prison. This is the problem with the Evans case, not that he
is free to continue his lucrative football career, but that the sentence he was
given was not sufficiently long enough for the crime he committed.
Ebola.
An Ebola epidemic will demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of western health care systems whether they be public or private. I'm glad I live in a country that has a public healthcare system free at the point of access. I wouldn't want to be living in the USA right now.
#Save Kimi Campaign
.
Kimi is a little white fox cub, who, along with thousands of other fox cubs, Burberry, the fashion company, will have butchered soon, so that the fatuous, vacuous, sub human scum they call customers can flaunt their butchered pelts in the name of fashion.
https://help.four-paws.org/en/call-burberry-be-fur-free
Shooting Themselves in the Foot?
The Tories are hoping to make it illegal to post material, considered offensive, on the internet. Does that mean that we will be unable to read the next Tory manifesto on-line?
“You quazy wabbit”. (Elmer Fudd).